Wikipedia的志願編輯已正式採用了一項新的“快速刪除”政策來打擊AI生成的內容的上升潮流。在8月4日最終確定https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/wiki/wikipedia_talk:speedy_deletion“ target=“ _ black”>之後，在社區共識之後，新規則，新規則，新規則，指定的G15，指定為G15，賦予人類的文章，這些跡像是由人類的大型語言刪除的，該文章是由人類的大型跡象所創建的。審查。
該策略是對“ AI Slop”不斷增長的量的直接響應，它威脅到平台的完整性並壓倒了其編輯者。 The criteria target obvious tells like fabricated citations or conversational phrases such as “as a large language model,”allowing for swift removal of low-quality submissions.
An ‘Existential Threat’: Why Wikipedia Needed a Faster Solution
The online encyclopedia, built on human collaboration, found its processes ill-equipped for automated content. Wikiproject AI的Ilyas Lebleu清理到
Wikipedia的標準刪除過程需要一個為期一周的討論，這是為人類規模的貢獻而設計的系統。 a way to delete it just as quickly,”highlighting the imbalance between creation and curation efforts.
Defining the Slop: What Qualifies for Speedy Deletion
The new G15 criterion is designed to be objective, targeting only the most blatant cases of unreviewed AI output. An article can be flagged for speedy deletion 如果符合兩個主要條件，確保該策略不是主體應用的。在…“或自我指的陳述“作為大型語言”模型。
第二種條件以“難以置信的不存在參考”或“荒謬的引用”為目標。可能類似於人工智能的怪癖。 Wikipedia的政策討論頁面以明確的共識達到頂峰，編輯結束了討論，說:“我正在下雪。 There is consensus to adopt this criterion as G15.”
This decision was not imposed by the Wikimedia Foundation but emerged from the community’s own governance process. The RfC saw extensive debate among editors, reflecting a grassroots effort to address a pressing operational challenge and reaffirm the platform’s commitment to human oversight.
This consensus was not reached overnight. Previous attempts to create a broad由於對主觀性的擔憂，反對政策取決於其緊密，客觀的標準，甚至可以持懷疑態度的編輯，這可以持續使用，而無需懲罰善行的貢獻者平台的適應性說:“維基百科的關鍵支柱是我們沒有牢固的規則，我們今天做出的任何決定都可以在幾年內重新審視。誠信是其人類編輯。
